Send Tokens to Many Addresses on PulseChain

A distribution list is the one part of a token launch where a quiet mistake costs you the tokens and the trust at the same time. Batching does not make the list correct — it makes the list reviewable before it becomes permanent.

What does a multisender do on PulseChain?

A multisender takes one token, one list of recipients with an amount against each, and moves the whole distribution in a single batched operation you approve once. You hold the list and you push the tokens; nobody on the receiving end has to do anything or spend anything. On Team Finance the multisender is $50 as of August 2026, charged in PLS, flat — not a percentage of what you send. PulseChain is EVM-compatible, so the list you build uses ordinary 0x addresses and ordinary ERC-20-style token contracts, and the batch resolves into transactions you can pull up on scan.pulsechain.com like any other.

Why is batching better than sending one transaction at a time?

Because a batch fails as one thing or succeeds as one thing, while two hundred manual sends fail one at a time, quietly, in the middle. Three differences matter. The first is failure surface: every manual transfer is a fresh opportunity to paste the wrong address, fat-finger a zero, or lose your place after an interruption, and nothing about transfer number 137 warns you that transfer number 42 went somewhere wrong. The second is review: a batch gives you a single moment where the entire distribution is visible as a total and as rows, before any of it is irreversible — manual sending never assembles that view, because there is no point at which the whole thing exists in one place. The third is the record. What you want to leave behind is one dated, verifiable set of transactions you can point an investor, an exchange, or a suspicious community member at. A scatter of individually signed transfers across a week is technically the same movement of tokens and is nothing like as easy to defend.

What is the difference between the multisender and the airdrop tool?

The multisender pushes and the airdrop pulls — that single distinction decides which one your job needs. With the multisender, you hold the recipient list and send the tokens directly; the recipient wakes up holding them. With the airdrop tool, which is $100 as of August 2026 and also charged in PLS, you fund an allocation and recipients claim it themselves.

Push is right for anything you owe. Contributor payments, team allocations that have come due, obligations from a raise, corrections after a mistake — these should not be conditional on whether the person is paying attention. Pull is right for anything you are offering. Community rewards, campaign incentives, loyalty distributions to a snapshot of holders — claim-based distribution filters for wallets that are actually alive, and an unclaimed allocation tells you something true about engagement that a successful push would have hidden. There is a self-interested reason to prefer claims for large community distributions too: you do not spray tokens into thousands of dormant addresses and then wonder why your holder count looks impressive and your circulating float behaves strangely.

Neither tool is the answer for payments on a schedule. Anything that should arrive monthly or unlock over quarters belongs in vesting ($100 as of August 2026), which automates both the cadence and the proof rather than asking you to remember to run a batch.

Worth knowing before you spend anything on distribution: staking pools on PulseChain are free as of August 2026. If your goal is to get tokens into the hands of committed holders rather than to discharge a specific debt, a pool that pays people for holding puts tokens out on terms you set, costs nothing to create, and does not require you to maintain a list at all.

How do you prepare a recipient list that will not fail?

Treat the list as the deliverable and the send as a formality, because every distribution disaster is a list problem that arrived on-chain. Four failure modes account for most of them.

Duplicates. A list assembled from a form, a snapshot, and a spreadsheet of manual additions will contain the same address twice, and the batch will pay it twice. Sort by address and check for repeats before anything else. Duplicates are also how a distribution silently runs short at the bottom of the list.

Decimals. Amounts have to be expressed in the units the tool expects for that specific token, and the token’s own decimals are the authority — not what a similar token used, not what a spreadsheet inferred. Get this wrong and you are off by orders of magnitude in one direction or the other. Read the decimals from the token contract and check one row by hand against them.

Truncated addresses. Spreadsheets are hostile to long hex strings. They will helpfully display an address in a narrow column, convert something to scientific notation, or drop a leading character on a paste, and the file you export will look fine at a glance. Verify that every address is a full-length 0x address of consistent length, and that the count of rows matches the count you expected.

Contracts that cannot return tokens. Not every address on your list is a wallet. Exchange deposit addresses, contracts that were never written to handle arbitrary token transfers, and addresses harvested from a public form can all accept tokens and hold them where nobody can retrieve them. There is no recall. Where the recipient is an organisation rather than an individual, confirm the address is one they control and can move funds from.

Why run a small test batch first?

Because a test batch is the only way to find out what the tool, the token and the list actually do together before the mistake is permanent. Send to a handful of addresses you control, plus one or two real recipients who know to expect it. Then verify on scan.pulsechain.com that the amounts that arrived are the amounts you intended — not the amounts you typed, the amounts that landed. This is where a decimals error announces itself harmlessly, where a token with unusual transfer behaviour shows you that the received amount differs from the sent amount, and where you learn whether your PLS balance is sufficient for gas across the full run. The cost of the test is a few minutes. The cost of skipping it is the whole distribution.

Where does distribution fit in a PulseChain launch sequence?

Distribution comes after your allocations are decided and locked, never before, and it belongs in the launch plan rather than as an afterthought. The sequence that works is: create the token, set aside and commit the allocations that need to be constrained, then distribute what genuinely belongs to people now. Running distribution first means you are moving tokens whose destiny you have not yet settled, and every recipient of that early distribution becomes a fact you have to plan around. The full ordering — creation, allocation, locks and vesting, distribution, verification — is set out in the PulseChain token launch checklist, and the multisender step should sit exactly where that checklist puts it.

What if you have publicly committed to locking those tokens?

Distributing tokens you have publicly said are locked is a credibility failure, not a bookkeeping one, and it is visible to anyone who looks. This is the specific version of the problem that bites PulseChain projects: on a chain where the launch pipeline burns LP automatically, the tokens people scrutinise are the team allocations, and a promise about those allocations is the main thing you have offered. If a batch moves tokens out of a supply you described as committed, the on-chain record shows it permanently, timestamped, next to the announcement that said otherwise.

The fix is ordering and honesty, not concealment. Lock or vest what you have committed to lock before you distribute anything, so that the tokens in the batch are demonstrably not the tokens under commitment — team token locks on PulseChain covers what that costs and what it proves. If circumstances genuinely require touching a committed allocation, say so first and explain why, because the alternative is that somebody else finds it and frames it for you. And whichever route you take, verify the result yourself rather than trusting a screenshot of an intention.

FAQ

How much does distribution cost on PulseChain? The multisender is $50 and the airdrop tool is $100 as of August 2026, both fixed in USD terms and charged in PLS, plus PulseChain network gas.

Should I use the multisender or the airdrop tool? The multisender pushes and the airdrop pulls — that single distinction decides which one your job needs.

Can a distribution be reversed after it is sent? No. Transfers on PulseChain are final once confirmed, which is why the list review and the test batch are the entire safety mechanism.

Do recipients need PLS to receive tokens? Not for a multisender push — you pay the gas and the tokens simply arrive. A claim-based airdrop requires the recipient to submit a claim transaction, so they need a small PLS balance.

Does PulseChain need special address formats or tooling? No. PulseChain is EVM-compatible, so standard 0x addresses, standard token contracts and ordinary EVM wallets apply, on chain ID 369.

Next steps: the PulseChain token launch checklist · team token locks · set up vesting · create a token · back to the PulseChain hub