Choosing the right fundraising model can feel like an easy choice for web3 projects - but do you have all the pro's and con's?
There are three popular models: ICO (Initial Coin Offering), IEO (Initial Exchange Offering), and IDO (Initial DEX Offering).
Each offer different paths to raise capital and distribute tokens, let's take a look at the options available and help you make the right choice.
Definitions of Each Fundraising Model
| Model | Full Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| ICO | Initial Coin Offering | A project sells its tokens directly to the public via its own website or app, without an intermediary. You will typically find a single landing page, or most activity in X or Telegram. |
| IEO | Initial Exchange Offering | A crypto exchange manages the token sale on behalf of the project, providing credibility, KYC/AML compliance, and access to users. |
| IDO | Initial DEX Offering | A decentralized exchange (DEX) hosts the token launch, using liquidity pools and smart contracts for permissionless fundraising. |
What are the Pros & Cons to each model?
ICO Pros & Cons
- ✅ Easy and fast to set up
- ✅ Full control over fundraising terms
- ❌ High scam risk and lack of investor protection
- ❌ Difficult to build initial liquidity without extensive marketing
IEO Pros & Cons
- ✅ Increased trust via exchange due diligence
- ✅ Built-in liquidity and exposure to exchange’s users
- ❌ High fees and less control for the project
- ❌ Participation gated by exchange KYC and account requirements
IDO Pros & Cons
- ✅ Permissionless access and immediate liquidity
- ✅ DeFi native audiences and community marketing already onboard
- ❌ Vulnerable if the IDO / Launchpad isn't audited and strict with quality control
- ❌ Regulations for participation may be difficult to navigate for some countries
IDO, IEO & ICO Comparison Table
| Feature | ICO | IEO | IDO |
|---|---|---|---|
| Platform | Project's own website | Centralized exchange (e.g., Binance, KuCoin) | Decentralized exchange (e.g., Uniswap, PancakeSwap) |
| Intermediary | None | Exchange | None (smart contracts handle execution) |
| Trust Layer | Low (depends on team reputation) | Moderate to High (exchange vetting) | Low to Moderate (community-driven, code-based trust) |
| KYC/AML | Optional or minimal | Required | Often optional, depending on the DEX |
| User Access | Global (but risky) | Limited to exchange users | Open to all DEX users |
| Cost for Project | Low setup cost | Exchange listing fees + revenue share | Low to moderate (liquidity provisioning costs) |
| Speed to Market | Fast | Moderate | Fast |
| Liquidity | Uncertain (depends on exchange listing later) | Typically listed immediately on exchange | Immediate via liquidity pools |
| Security | High risk of scams and rug pulls | More secure due to exchange vetting | Smart contract vulnerabilities or liquidity drain risks |
| Regulation | Lightly regulated | More compliant due to exchange policies | Light regulation; decentralization complicates enforcement |
| Community Involvement | Often limited to one-time buyers | Access limited by exchange | Strong; IDOs often involve early supporters and DeFi communities |
Real-World Examples For Launches
Let's take a look at some iconic, historic examples to give you a few ideas of what the launches for each model would look like:
Initial Coin Offering Examples
- Ethereum (ETH) – 2014
Raised ~$18 million in 42 days; the origin of the modern smart contract ecosystem. - EOS – 2017
Raised over $4 billion in one of the most high-profile ICOs in history. - Tezos (XTZ) – 2017
Raised ~$232 million - that's quite an impressive raise for anyone.
Initial Exchange Offering Examples
- BitTorrent (BTT) – 2019 on Binance.
Raised $7.2 million in minutes; brought massive attention to IEOs. You would need to be living under a rock to not know BitTorrent. - Elrond (EGLD) – 2019 on Binance, and now known as MultiversX.
Raised ~$3.25 million; known for its scalable blockchain. - Matic Network (Polygon) – 2019 also on Binance
Raised ~$5 million; now one of the leading Ethereum scaling solutions, and father to countless dApps, projects, and communities on Polygon.
Initial DEX Offering Examples
- Uniswap (UNI) – 2020
Launched via retroactive airdrop and liquidity pools; kickstarted DEX token adoption. And certainly something Team.finance is familiar with! - SushiSwap (SUSHI) – 2020
Used DEX liquidity mining and community-led token distribution. - RMRK – 2021 on Kusama parachains
A fully decentralized IDO with strong community support and no VC involvement. They're deep inside the world of NFTs for very good reasons.
Conclusion
- Use ICOs if you want full control and a fast launch, but be ready to work hard on trust and marketing. You're probably going to spend most of your time marketing the coin, building a community, and carefully managing it. Unfortunately, most communities die quickly if not maintained - so be sure that you can keep the hype going.
- Choose IEOs if you want credibility and access to a large user base, but can afford exchange fees. Marketing still plays a fundamental role here, but being listed on an exchange is always a benefit.
- Opt for IDOs if you prioritize decentralization, community, and immediate liquidity - and you know that the launchpad provider has a good reputation, solid history of activating their community, and excellent marketing.
Each fundraising model has it's advantages & disadvantages - which is why we take the time to discuss options and consult for web3 projects - regardless of their chosen fundraising method.
Ultimately it comes down to what you're comfortable with, what experience your own team has, and if you would rather place your trust in experts who are skilled in web3 communities, marketing, and launching tokens or projects.
Share
Back to Blog